I am looking to use a Network Attached Storage device for home use, but i am not sure which device to choose.
I would like to keep costs reasonable while obtaining raid 5 reliability. There are many products on the market, but reviews for these products are either limited or do not seem to have high rankings of the products.
Can someone suggest a good information source? or alternatively a recommendation.
Personally, I would run a RAID 10 with 4 drives. RAID 5 has big performance hits. Too many read and writes shorten lifetime of drives and will cost more in the long run only with 3 drives compared to 4 with RAID 10. I left a link below, but do a search for RAID 5 vs RAID 10, RAID is definitely more favorable.
Last year I bought 4 500GB Western Digital Drives for about $55, so I’d imagine you can do better than that now.
As far as NAS goes, it seems like almost all of them are overpriced and have slow transfer rates. The whole point is that you don’t want your external drives to be bottlenecked by the configuration you choose. Depending on your drives they will probably not be reading/writing faster than 80 MB/s. With 4 drives, you want to make sure that you have throughput of about 320 MB/s.
So the cheapest solution if possible is to setup a RAID on a computer that is accessible to the whole network. If you’re Motherboard supports RAID and has 4 SATA connection that is your best and cheapest solution or you can you can buy a good PCIe RAID Controller Card if your motherboard doesn’t support RAID. Make sure the PCIe slot is at least PCIe x2 because PCIe x1 will only give you 250 MB/s in bandwidth as opposed to 500 MB/s, not to mention the RAID Controller Card you choose should be capable at running 2x as well.
Technically, you could even build a very cheap computer that cost less than a good NAS but will be just as fast or faster and way more uses than a dumbbox.
Obviously if money was not object you can buy a top of the line NAS from a good company like Promise, but even their home NAS transfers only at 1000 Mb/s, which is really 120 MB/s.
One response so far